It’s ?. We’re deep into the ?.
Almost every concept you know can now be represented as a tiny ? that varies depending on where it’s displayed.
Not since ? were formalized in ancient times have we had this many new characters added to every alphabet that exists.
Emoji aren’t there as a stand-in for words. Obviously 1,851 ?s can’t match up to the richness of our everyday language.
So, what’s the point?
To me, a ? is more celebratory than any woohoo.
I’d rather see a ? than the words Mt. Fuji.
They can be used as hashtags on Instagram, now.
They can be Googled.
They can even appear in URLs.
And a lot of procedurally generated art couldn’t exist without it.
✷ . ˚
˚ . *
· . .
· ˚ ·
. · * ✵
? · · ✹@tiny_star_field
— tiny astronaut (@tiny_astro_naut) October 12, 2016
? ? ☁️
— tiny cities (@tiny_cityscapes) October 12, 2016
Something so seemingly superfluous has brought me a lot of ?— I’ve written about it before, and still find myself coming back with something to say.
As we move into the emoji age, is it possible they really could evolve to become a genuine stand-in for communication? Maybe even the next ? language?
Unicode originally released 722. Then came another 250. Now we’re up to 1,851…
? — :face-with-tears-of-joy: — was the 2015 Oxford Dictionary’s word of the year. WORD of the year. I’m not sure what I think of that, but I do like that communication is getting more creative thanks to the fact we have more ‘words’ with different meanings.
Oh, and apparently ? is surging in popularity for a few different reasons, despite the fact that it is:
… Only ⌛ will tell.